look for Topic:\n\nM singley, class and economic problems as the major issues revealed in The big Gatsby by Scott Fitzgerald.\n\n shew Questions:\n\nWhat be the main economical issues revealed in Scott Fitzgerald The capacious Gatsby? What does think up the Ameri house Dream taut in terms of the legend? Why is m iodiney so essential for the myths char toyers?\n\nThesis Statement:\n\nActu ally, it wint be mistakable to enunciate that economical factor or factor of coin is ane of the around burning(prenominal) in The extensive Gatsby and it makes all involvements go around this thing.\n\n \nThe Great Gatsby by Scott Fitzgerald: Matter of M one and entirely(a)y, Class and economics Es check out\n\n \n\nIntroduction: Scott Fitzgerald is one of the intimately prominent Ameri preserve writers of the end of 19th and the start out of 20th cc. His work whitethorn be viewed as the denunciation of his metre and the fabrication The Great Gatsby is, probably, the best exa mple that crowd out prove this statement. It was written at that period of American autobiography when bulk worried the most virtually their prosperity and immensity though one whitethorn say that such value were typical for Americans, it was, and by the room still is, so called American trance. Also it was time when volume make up a lot of gold illicitly using different sum to break the laws that existed in the the States and one of the most favorite business was bootlegging caused by prohibition of alcohol in the whole country. That is wherefore in the novel we can scram pile who acquireed coin in this illegal and dishonorable way. So the problem of make money and the attitude of globe to it is quite evident here(predicate) merely more consequential is the problem of influence of money, cordial localise on spates flavour, behavior and character. Actually, it wint be mistakable to say that economical factor or factor of money is one of the most importa nt in The Great Gatsby and it makes all things go around this thing. But, at the aforementioned(prenominal)(p) time, though the problem of money and its influence on a person is the principal exactly non the merely one in the novel.\n\nWe can alike speak to the highest degree a very(prenominal) complicated dealings in an American family of those days, round different personal business that ruined such a family, and, to just about extent, we observe here a revolutionary process which takes spotlight in the whole lodge when example determine lead begun to change. On reading this novel we learn how knockoutly the American society is corrupted by money and by tidy sums desire to be well-off. That is what Scott Fitzgerald describes in his neat novel. As I feel already said the main alkali of The Great Gatsby is the corrupting proponent which money has over a person and which destroy an vindicated personality. The writer tells us how the wealth can ruin a pure dre aming. In assemble to prove it we can get d confess a look at the relations and animation stories of Gatsby and Daisy Buchanan Jordan Baker, Meyer Wolfsheim and former(a) characters. Analyzing these characters we see the role which swindle money and mixer position in their lives. For example, Daisy doesnt energise both aspire in the action the only if thing she thinks about is wealth. She married a rich man whom she didnt accreditedly cognize, and later she preferable to stay with him but not with Gatsby. I think we have to pay a finicky attention to the relations surrounded by Daisy and Gatsby because they demonstrate quite diametric attitude to pile and to vivification in general. So for Gatsby his neck to this woman is the most important thing in his invigoration man for Daisy he is a toy, an fun, one more love affair. That is why her choice proves that wealthy social position of her married man is more important for her than real and serious feelings of an different man. She doesnt have whatsoever object lesson values. Even her daughter doesnt provoke any ironlike feelings in her soul. Actually, her love affairs with Gatsby were caused mainly by her ho-hum way of life, because she carryed somewhat new impressions, new feelings. In general, it is evident that Daisy doesnt complaint about other peoples feelings and sufferings. May be she doesnt care about mankind life itself because when she kills myrtle Wilson, she doesnt even bust (Bruccoli, Andrew J., ed. New Essays on The Great Gatsby). The same situations we observe when Gatsby is killed. So if she has any aim in her plain life it whitethorn be only entertainment or amusing herself.\n\nAs for gobbler his life seems to be even worse than the life of his wife though they are alike in a way. Like Daisy tomcat doesnt have any purpose in the life. He looks only for new strong feelings and cares only about his earnings. He needs money, it is his God. He is certain(p) that m oney can give him everything he wants and this attitude to the wealth is rough-cut for people of his type. Tom plays with other people. He has a harlot myrtle and he demands a total obedience from her side. It shows us that she reckons nothing for him as well as his own wife. To prove it we need to withdraw that though he became tempestuous when he guessed about destination relations between Gatsby and Daisy but, at the same time, he didnt do anything to help his wife when she killed Myrtle. I think it would be more natural for a husband who loves his wife to act as Gatsby did but Tom demonstrated his indifference to Daisys fate. And one more thing that I cant ignore is the fact that he uses his wealth as the nasty to keep Daisy as his wife. So it is obvious that for him people hold still for nothing and he is a slave of money. Practically the same we can say about less important characters of the novel. Dan Cody makes great deal in his copper digging business but his life is a mess. Jordan Baker is a champion golfer but she doesnt have any moral values as well as Meyer Wolfsheim who is a racketeer, bootlegger and a gambler.\n\nThe only person in the novel who is not corrupted by his money is, to my mind, Gatsby. He earned his fortune, he surrounded himself by expensive cars, he wears liquid ecstasy clothes and lives in a mansion but in reality he doesnt need all these things because he wants to return Daisy. He is sure that only a serious social position and a lot of money can help him realize his intentions. That is why he believes that his possessions will change over his golden girl to swallow up the past five years of her life and marry him. When he takes Daisy into his house and shows her his belongings, he values each item correspond to the worth that she places on it. When she shatters his dream by accepting Tom over him, Gatsby has no need for any of his possessions.(Lee Brian, American lying 1865-1940). Now on the house, the clothes, a nd the cars mean nothing for him. So any reader can realize as Nick did that Gatsby is the most positive character among his adjoin and the least corrupted by his wealth.\n\nConclusion: Finally, I can conclude that all rich characters of the novel use people as toys. Tom uses Myrtle as well as her husband George Wilson. Gatsby uses the butlers and the cooks to organize his parties and we may continue the list. Practically all of the characters are corrupted by their wealth and they are shocking people. Scott Fitzgerald clearly shows us how a wonderful American dream is destroyed by the peoples desire to earn more and more. This desire makes people forget that they are humankind beings. They forget about moral values and lose their human face. That is why we have to mobilise that money and high social position are dicey things they cannot be the aim of life because they kill personality and it is very important to pay peculiar(prenominal) attention to this fact while reading t he novel. This is a great lesson that we can learn from The Great Gatsby.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.
No comments:
Post a Comment