In her novel amongst the Acts, Virginia Wolf explores the dichotomy that arises when dickens completely separate social classes live under one detonating device to overhearher. Likewise, Jamaica Kincaid gives an intimate portrayal of a young au coupling working in a wealthy, white household. Though the two authors differ greatly in the use of servants in their novels, umpteen of their ideas about servants roles in society are similar. Even though the servants in Woolfs novel are, for the most part, secondary characters, Woolf hints at their magnificence by using words and phrases suggestive of the servants equality, perhaps raze superiority, over the main characters. Kincaid does not bother with subtlety in showing how her servant character Lucy is vastly superior to the throng for whom she works. In both books, the authors use careful diction, imagery and symbol to portray their ideas about servants. For purposes of clarity and length this essay go forth solely focus on comparing and contrasting the chase passages: Pages 31-34 in Between the Acts and pages 32-33 and 58 in Lucy .
In the passage from Between the Acts, Woolfs diction gives the reader information on the position of servants in the household.
Firstly, Woolf declines to give the reader the strong name of Mitchells boy, indicating that his transient existence in and out of the household (as well as in and out of the novel), is not important, even though his real name was written in the Doomsday Book (31), a book of antiquity that inclination of an orbited family names. Woolfs omission of Mitchells boys name is contrasted by the list that follows of three family names Waythorn, Roddam, and Pyeminster, all of which are also in the Doomsday book. The implication of listing these names while sledding out the real name of Mitchells boy is that even...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment