Susan Fraiman is arguing that Darcy woos away non Elizabeths prejudice, But her judgment entire. She is saying that Elizabeth has given up her prejudice and also something more important her judgment while Darcy relinquishes his pride. Darcy has a right to be proud and have that sense of pride. He is the wealthy owner of the famous family realm of Pemberley in Derbyshire. He comes from a higher class and Elizabeth does not, do her prejudice. Through Austens definition of pride we see that she makes a clear distinction between men and women. Through the ii different genders we see that men carry the pride and women the vanity. Pride is relating to our opinion of ourselves, and vanity to how others look at us.
Darcy seems to be jolly stuck up when we first meet him in the novel and Elizabeth is not interested at all. I also feel as if Elizabeth does lose her prejudice in some way. Because of the opinion she makes onwards she even gets to know Darcy. She has no knowledge of Darcy before her first encounter of him and she decides she doesnt care for him. But then throughout she seems to lose that prejudice and is now all for him. So I feel like you could say that yes, Darcy did take it away from her. Towards the ascendent of the novel Elizabeth says I could easily forgive his pride, if he had not mortified mine as stated in the critical essay. From this I feel like Austen wanted us to authorise that...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment