Dialogue Between Plato and Aristotle Essay Example for Free

Dialogue Between Plato and Aristotle Essaynetherworld No, listen. What I am saying is that the environment or ashes that we live in is full of unevenness, imperfection and impurity this due to the fact that this digit is merely a copy of the capricel world that one would understand once they rise supra our physical environment and grasp it intellectually. Aristotle I understand you just fine but I discord with you. I agree that our world is an imperfect world but I object to the nonion that it is non palpable or that there is another invisible form out there from which it is cloned. I pick up that preposterous, everything is right here on earth, physically.Pluto No. What we see on earth physically as you say are just mimics or artificial replicas of the real thing however with a upsurge of imperfections. This is just an illusion of the real thing. Aristotle How can that be when our natural world is real and physical? allow me explain it to you clearly, our world, th is world is made up of many forms. Sure, they may not be ideal, pure or perfect but our senses identify with them. Pluto Well, our senses identify with them because they are copies of the perfect form and we have acquaintance of them. Let me explain it to you.Knowledge must have as its object that which is openly real as juxtaposed with that which is an appearance only, that which is fully real must be fixed, permanent and unchanging- in the realm of cosmos as opposed to that which is in the realm of physical. That is why you call these world physical when it is just a perceptual experience from the true ideal form. Aristotle That is absurd If experience has shown us anything is that individual substances live on and are real, being predicated of the substance and that an individual is not produced by some idea or model the actually existPluto Now you have joined people inexperienced in the theory of forms. Captives in a cave, bound to the wall with no likelihood of turning you r heads. With fire burning behind you, you can only see the wall of the cave and the shadows of the puppets placed between you and the fire. You are incapcapable to fathom that the shadows you see and the echoes you divulge are a reflection of real objects, behind you. This world that is available to our senses exists only as a reflection of the real world. AristotleHere is where I differ to you completely An individual is not formed from the perception of anothersmind but from an individual who through germ or seed was able to reproduce another one hence, the seed in the individual would be in potency form because of its capacity to become an individual in future. Every individual is a compound of matter and form, not a mirror or perception of another from another form. PlutoThat is just how easy it is to drop off appearance for reality, just like the captives in the cave experience, they easily refer to the shadows using the names of the real objects that the shadows reflect. Th is just shows that knowledge is only a reflection of the real ideas in our minds.What is seen on the earth is an bogus of the real thing. The captives, by looking at the shadows may learn what an item is but this does not change them to claim that it refers to an object, which they have seen. Likewise, we need the physical objects in order to enable us acquire concepts. Aristotle So your idea is that we live in an imagined world and that is copied from an ideal world and that the physical items and entities we encounter on our day to day activities and with which our senses identify with are merely there for us to acquire concepts? Pluto Yes.Exactly Aristotle You are not serious You do realize that the possibility of error forces the mind to determine the truth hardihood of a given statement. Meaning the intellect must have adequate reasons, which can ensure the proposed fantasy conforms to reality. These are the foundation of perfect knowledge, knowledge through causes. Not tha t we originate from some made up form that we cannot access, but that we originate from an individual. Matter is the indeterminate element, which is unchanging, and form is the force and power shaping and growing the individual.That is a structure of two statements leading to correct reasoning. Pluto So you object to my whole idea? Aristotle Completely It lacks a foundation and crumbles upon itself. Your own argument argues that there is need for physical objects to enable us acquire concepts but your idea is based on an unseen form that cannot be confirmed physically. Pluto We could argue about it for hours. Its a stalemate. Aristotle Seems we have found an impasse, but I win