Establishment of Unique State Language in Office Work Essay

mentionWe want to ac recogniseledge our p arnts for dowericipating and befriending us to abide a questionnaire in the bow institutions in Astana. in addition we would like to thank Saltanat writing table of head of judicature for distri nonwithstandingion of questionnaires among respondents and operate actions in delivering egresss to Almaty.Abstract forthwith the issue of nomenclatures is one of the most actual, disputable. That is why government tries to improve the conditions of democracy row. This year saucily constabulary was created it put ups that alone enfranchisements must be indite in Kazakh. This permute give m roughly(prenominal) disputes and discussions and shapes much popular. As an actual issue this problem was elect by the authors of enquiry. The look into question what is the vantage halt of Astana citizens to establishment of singular invoke nomenclature in business leader campaign? Research objectives argon to inquire into checks of concourse to this law, find the advantages and disadvantages of revision, to trace the move of transition on the touch on of execute. subsequently analyzing affirmable consequences, chase explore possibility was made bulk would fo under negative delegate of entrance on the establishment.In lay to achieve more energy the instrument of survey design questionnaire was chosen. It was conducted among 20 pot the inhabitants of Astana who achievement in the postulate institutions, because change of linguistic communication in the lieu endure impacts them directly. Convenience sampling was used, because authors chose merely closest persons as respondents. At the report of results of questionnaire it was found that 70% of community stomach affirmative, 25% neutral, 5% negative attitude to the change. Thus, the results of questionnaire shows that the authors hypothesis was non justified it was defined that bulk feed positive viewpoint on the establishmen t, also at that place is no intimately all difficulties connected with the change and it does non impact on the process and quality of the employ.I. IntroductionA. Reasons for Undertaking ResearchFor almost 300 old age Kazakhstan was under the pressure of neighbour Russia, so since it was happened our cultural wealth began to eradicate. blabbering to was almost lost, and nobody knew what would be in the future. Unfortunately, the most government agencyful and evolution countrified Soviet yoke fell to pieces (Akishev, 1996). So, since from 1990 year on that point were born(p) new countries. And Kazakhstan was not exception. Like a newborn baby, country started to do its first steps. In this way new composition was created. Kazakh is a secernate spoken phrase, and Russian is official says the constitution of Kazakhstan. hardly this year new law took place since 2007 year all documentations must be in Kazakh, it advances. only is the country with only half Kaza kh-speaking inhabitancies ready to this change, how the multinational commonwealth forget react to it? This is our issue. The government made a decision, only when can we address with it?Only ampere-second0 civil servants of 5000 can speak Kazakh in reach or can do position produce in it, documentation nowadays executes in Russian and only after that it translates into Kazakh. It is right to study a question what de cave in follow after this establishment? Consequences whitethorn be different but more obvious thing that there allow for be realityy difficulties because of un f aring language. With this poor condition the mathematical process of ladder will continue, consequently, the standards, the value of engage will decrease. The change of language of office work will lead to discrimination of not Kazakh-speaking population. Because of this its important to investigate this issue. After analyzing possible consequences, following research hypothesis was made the at titude of major population of Astana has negative point of view on this change of language of office work in Kazakh.B. Research MethodsIn order to achieve more efficiency from research survey is using here. To investigate exact attitudes of good deal the work hire statistics, numerical entropy, also the viewpoints, position, suggestions of Astana citizenry must be considered in the work. So, survey design is the best way to attain the most consistently organized point here. Also questionnaire is being consumed as instruments of research. It was chosen because, in order to determine the views of good deal and situation in the country, quantitative method will be helpful. The data and facts that they will pay off whitethorn help to solve sh atomic number 18ly our problem.As it is written in previous, statistics is necessary, and questionnaire whitethorn give new data and numbers, so it is helpful in this area, specific questions in questionnaire (open-ended) the opportunity t o determine the exact point of view of mountain and their suggestions. The questionnaire consists of cardinal weakens. The first one is written in order to investigate kind status of mountain and give demographic data. The second sections let is to ascertain the attitude of the person to the establishment of unique state language in the office work. The questionnaire was held on the period 14-16 of June in Astana. 20 mess working in the state establishments were respondents of the questionnaire. The type of the research was primary, thingumabob technique was used.. Research StructureThe research base is divided into the sestet following chapters Introduction this digress of the research benefactions brief description of the research, reasons for pioneer it and methods which will be used during this research. Review of the literature this part of the research is dedicated to information that was found in appropriate literature in order to describe problems of establish ment the unique language in the office work. Field research results is a descriptive part of work, where authors should give only description of results that they receive from questionnaire or/an interview. Analysis and discussion in this part of research paper all information presented before will be analyzed and will be tried to define future mindset of the industry and investors decision that can be taken. goal authors make a summary of the research paper.Bibliography sources that were used in writing research. Appendices include the questionnaire paper and interview paper.II. Literature reviewA. Historical background of Kazakh languageThe florid book of history of Kazakhs includes following pages at the beginning of XVIII speed of light west part of present territory of Kazakhstan started to join to Russian Empire. In cattiness of resistance of Orta and Uly Juzes during next hundred years all regions of country wholly became a piece of neighbour state. Since that time by the order of imperator Russian Empire Alexander I commenced the change of ruling power they chose the heads of juzes. In the 30-40es of XVIII century fortresses were built at the boarders of Kazakhstan. Russian-speaking raft started to immigrate into the Kazakh land. So, these were the first steps of small town policy and active central of finishing, widely spreading of Russian language and slowing down of Kazakh. (Kozybayev,1995).After formation of the Soviet Union in 1917, the discrimination of all nations with their culture and language that existed on the territory of USSR took place. Politics of state was the creation of integrated society, where were the one constitution of USSR, which named Russian the single language of communication. From that period in different parts of the biggest country of the world the policy of inculcation of Russian language started. This process was the ideology, which was considered by government of Russia. Following 70 years lead to the al most wholly losing of inwrought language. As an example of it in 1954 when virgin land started to build up 640.000 people from early(a) countries of Union came to KazSSR. As a consequence of it new educational establishments were built, but with this immigration only in south region of country 700 Kazakh schools were closed, children stayed without needed education.Also the names of water-lands were changed in Russian, in order to make more comfortable the life of our guests. With this problem of eradication of folk wealth presidencyd not only Kazakhstan, but opposite 12 countries of USSR, e supernumeraryly Moldova, Azerbaijan, Latvia, Georgia, etc (Akishev, Baipakov, 1996). So, after colonization for almost 300 years young independent Republic of Kazakhstan had to face with problem of wholly reconstruction of society, policy and economy of country. As a consequence of this dependence became following data according to Agency of Statistics from 01.01.2004 the population of co untry is follow to 14,952 million people 57, 19 % Kazakhs, 27, 24% Russians, 3, 14% Ukrainians, 2, 74% Uzbeks and other 120 nationalities. For the present time about 3 million Kazakhs do not go to sleep their native language. 64,4 % of population receive with Kazakh, when 84,8% speak Russian (Agency of statistics of RK , 2004).B. Status of Kazakh language nowadaysWith getting reign in 1991 Republic of Kazakhstan got opportunity to raise its national wealth. So, the new constitution from 30th August of 1995, in the 7th article of the first part (general provisions) of it states 1. the state language of the Republic of Kazakhstan shall be the Kazak language. 2. In state institutions and topical anaesthetic self-administrative bodies the Russian language shall be officially used on equal grounds along with the Kazak language. 3. The state shall promote conditions for the study and development of the languages of the people of Kazakhstan. (Constitution of RK, 1995).C. Problems and d iscussions on the issueAccording to B. Omarov (2005) the head of Committee on problems of language of Ministry of information, culture and sport in correspondents of State programme of function and development of languages for 2001-2010 years, affirmatived by decree of the president of RK from 07.02.2001 550 in all regions of republic conduct measures of halting-placely change of office work on the state language. Because of this office work of 5 regions (Kyzylorda, Zhambyl, South-Kazkahstan, Atyrau, and Mangistau) was fully translated on state language. On the base of account of stagely translation of office work on state language civil republic agenda and brought in consideration of Government of RK. In agreement to this graphic from 01.01.2010 is expected fully translation of office work on state language. Due to this law there capture been appeared problems of discrimination of not-Kazakh-speaking people in the country.Nowadays majority of people ask question, such what th is change will lead to? According to Martha Brill Olcott (1997), there is a crocked sense of disquiet among many of the countrys ethnic Russians, who note that the break-up of the USSR has turned a familiar country into an alien one, and has left them as second-class citizens in what they themselves perceive as their native land. And the translation of language in office work will possibly grow open between Kazakhstans Kazakhs and European communities. But specialists advise not to confuse. As Dariga Nazarbayeva states (2006), the change of language will not lead to discrimination of not-Kazakh-speaking people. Russian will stay as an official language. What just people should do to learn about hundred of words and do documentations basing on them? Akim of Almaty I. Tasmagambetov (2005) and deputy, poet M. Shahanov (2005) become intimate in the opinion that world experience of states shows that presence of native language impact on stability, security of independent country.Our main aim is to raise the status of using Kazakh on the level of Russian. That is why akims actively accept the new law. They claim that the wealth that our ancestors gave to people should be kept. But there are whatever opposite points of view on this newspaper. slightly non-Kazakh parts of population of RK think that government tries to slowly eradicate other nations from the land of Kazakhs. Some people, like O. Suleimenov (2005) the representative of RK in UNESCO thinks that republic is not yet ready for this change. This change may causes problems of leaving the country of other nations. At first, think this part of country, we should secure the fundament, desexualize people to work grammar of language, to type reliable text books, in order to make easier the studying deeply and efficiently the language.At that time the look of education and accomplishment B. Aitimova (2006) states that state program of Kazakh language for 2001-2010 is developing. She claims that 77% of schools are in Kazakh or mixed. But state Secretary O. Abdikarimov does not agree with that by say that 500 million tenge was given from budget, nevertheless, there are no results. The minister culture and information Y. Ertisbaev (2006) he offers to make social polls. So, after some time, the problem will be partly solved. drumheadThus, there are many views on the issue of changing language of office work in Astana. Arguments of both(prenominal) sights are really strong they were confirmed with statistics and prognoses of the critics. In discussions of the problem play role all social classes of Kazakhstan, because of this issue relates to all citizens of our country. Although there is no exact answer at the present time, but research will give it in the near future.III. Field research (Questionnaire results)A. General informationThe research question of present work is think to find out what is the viewpoint of Astanas citizens to the establishment of unique state langua ge in office work. Thus, in order to develop useful statistics and find out what are the precise attitudes of people on this issue, given questionnaire was conducted by researches. The field research was divided into three parts, which will allow to the reader comfortably find useful information (indirect data common information, direct specific material). At the period 14-16 of June in state institutions of Astana 20 people, who welcome full-time work place, turn out been asked by researches. Target population of the research is adults from 18 years old, in which 11 are female and 9 are male. As respondents were the closest easy people, convenience sampling was used.B. Demographic (indirect) dataAt the process of work the category of age of respondents was divided into four parts 18-25 (10%), 25-35 (35%), 35-50 (50%), over 50 (5%). 80% are Kazakhs and 20% are Russian respondents. From chart 1 it can be seen that the level of receiveing of Kazakh and Russian languages among 2 0 people picResearches have investigated that 50 per cent of people know Kazakh in access, 35 colloquial and 15 % do not speak on state language, while 90 % of people know Russian in advance and 10% colloquially. remit 1 shows the dowry degree of people who knows outside(prenominal) languages and what are that languages. Language Percentage English 25% German 25% Belarusian 5% Dont know other language 45% Table 1.The quarter part speaks English, another(prenominal) Germany, while 5 % know Belarusian and other 45% do not know any foreign language. It was investigated that all 20 people have luxuriously education, from which 14 people studied in Russian (70%) and 6 in Kazakh (30%). The chart 2 shows the in what language people mostly express with each otherpicHalf of respondents communicate in Russian, when 30% talk in Kazakh and 20% of people speak on both languages. At the process of work it was defined that all 20 people have full-time permanent work place, 19 (95%) are s tate workers, and 1 (5%) is a member of join-stock company. C. Attitudes of people (direct data)The chart 3 demonstrates the position of people toward the establishment. pic 80% of people think that it is right to establish such innovation, 15 % has neutral position and 5% are against the law. 70% of respondents have positive point of view to the establishment, 25% are neutral and 5% have negative attitude. From 20 people, who was asked, 12 (60%) are expressed willingness to do office work in Kazakh, while 8 (40%) people are not ready to such work. Percentage of people who face with office work in Kazakh Faced 60% Dont faced 40% From table 2 you may see that 60% of respondents have faced with doing office work in Kazakh while 40% do not. Table 2From table 3 you may find out the percentage level of kinds of spreading of information about the establishment of unique language in the office work. 36,4 % of respondents have got information from work, 20% from relatives, 18,2% from fri ends, 15,6% through mass-media, 3,2% from another sources, while 6,6% do not know about this law. Kinds of Percentage bed cover of info Relatives 20% Friends 18.2% Mass-media 15.6% At work36.4% Other 3.2% Dont know about this law 6.6% Table 3.It was investigated in table 4 that change of language of office work for half of respondents has not any impact, 40% did not give answers, 5% do not know and on 5% has influence. The influence on work Percentage No 50% Yes 5% Do not know 5% Do not give answers 40% Table 4It was defined that 45% of people have not faced with any difficulties on work because of this establishment, 15% have some problems, and 40% did not give answers. It was investigated that the administration of state institutions have provide some conditions in order to prepare personnel to the establishment for 40% of respondents, and 60% have not got any programmes. People have mentioned such conditions like providing CDs, preparing lessons, electronic portal, pr ogrammes. 35% are satisfied with conditions that government provides, 15% not utilized, 10% is neutral and 40% did nit give answers.To the open-ended questions 90% respondents have given different answers, 10% preferred do not mention any suggestions. The majority of respondents suggested creating of courses, which will give opportunity to workers improve the level of knowing Kazakh. 20% of people were for establishment, but it was mentioned that this reform should be executed gradually. Another 20% have demonstrated desire to establish this law, because it is the time to raise the authority of state language. Someone was against establishment, and other, vice versus, suggested compulsory change language from Russian to Kazakh.D. SummaryIn spite the fact that most of people know more Russian that Kazakh, and that they communicate in Russian, it was investigated in generally that people have positive position to this establishment. in that respect is a lack of preparing courses, but people disposed well.IV. Analysis and discussionUnivariate analysisThe research question of present work is what is the attitude of Astana people to the establishment of unique state language in the office work in Kazakhstan? After analyzing possible consequences the hypothesis stated that people would have negative point of view on the change of the language in the office work. a. Analyzing demographic data. As the change of language takes place in the state establishments, 95% of respondents were chosen from them. At the process of work it was investigated that the level of knowing Russian of 20 people, who were conducted the questionnaire, is higher than Kazakh 100% know official language, while 15% do not know state language at all.In spite the fact that everyone knows Russian and the major part 85% of people know Kazakh, only the half part speak in Russian and 20% use only Kazakh, while 30% speak on both languages. Thus, ignoring the fact that the majority people know Kazakh , language of communication among people still is mostly Russian. b. Analyzing attitudes of people to the establishment (questionnaire, literature review). The main design of given work was to find the viewpoint of Astana people to the establishment. From the tabular form of frequency distribution we may see the main result of research. Table 1. Attitude to the establishment office work in Kazakh relative frequency % Valid % Cum % Positive 14 70 70 70 Neutral 5 25 25 95 Negative 1 5 5 100 Total 20 100 100 more than than half part of respondents have positive point of view on the change and only 5% were against it, so Astana people mostly are for establishment of state language. Analyzing the results of questionnaire, it was discovered that the major part of people think that it is right to change the language of documentation and they are ready to the transition. Authors made a expectation that the change of language may lead to conflicts among nations, it would be the disc rimination of not-Kazakh people, the process of work will delay and quality of it would reduce. But the results show opposite thing main part of people state that they have not faced with any difficulties, that the change does not impact on the done work and its efficiency does not decrease. 80% of respondents were Kazakhs possibly, this is a reason of positive results in the questionnaire. Anyway, every man lives in Kazakhstan, may be that is why they have to answer positively, and may be, they had not other choice.Topic is very sensitive and both sides Kazakh and not-Kazakh people know it. Nowadays there are many issues on the theme of developing of Kazakh, and people do not react on them quasi(prenominal) someone is for raising the status of state language, someone afraid of this, because of unwitting Kazakh. Already 15 years Kazakhstan is independent country, it is obvious that Kazakh language should have specific status, it should have its own important place, and people sh ould know it. It is already time to raise Kazakh, but not to eradicate Russian, because it is still the language on which all multinational population of country speaks, in which we communicate with our neighbours on international arena. People, by understanding it, should improve state language, by not disturbing official language. So, also, based on the results of questionnaire, it was found that government develops such things as courses, discs, electronic portals, programmes to prepare personnel to the change, but people mostly dissatisfied with these conditions, because almost all people suggest creating new instruments to improve language.This fact means that there is a lack of the books, special methods of studying, good learn, etc. O. Suleimenov (2005) also came to this conclusion. He thinks that this change may cause problems of leaving the country of other nations. But there is a civilisation for some questions (about have they faced with any difficultiesmbecause of the change, have establishment impact the work, do they satisfied with conditions that government creates to prepare personnel?) the third part of people did not give answers. Does it mean that people are cover something and expert is right? In the reality the issue of language is very sensitive government tries to improve the authority of Kazakh while it seems that Russian is under discrimination. Among the members of parliament, government, also there are many debates on this theme.Akims, ministers say that they are undertaking measures as preparing personnel through the course, making privilege to people, who know Kazakh, raising their wages, but relying on opinions of people, we may conclude that it is not enough, because there is no efficient results, especially because the base of courses are very weak. There are some advantages and disadvantages of this issue for Kazakh people it is good because their language is developing, but for other nations it is difficult, but they can do nothing with it the law already exists, in spite the fact many people do not know Kazakh and there are no real measures that can prepare them. The data from literature review and questionnaire results are not similar, if some regime are against establishment, main part of respondents support the change. This means that situation is not as negative as state the data of literature review. More people know or learning Kazakh than official statistics show. The state of Kazakh is improving.V. ConclusionThe research question of present work is what is the attitude of Astana people to the establishment of unique state language in the office work in Kazakhstan? By considering the possible consequences and results, following hypotheses was made the attitude of major population of Astana would have negative point of view on this change of language of office work from Russian into Kazakh. According to the results of questionnaire, the prediction of authors was mistaken majority of respondent s have positive viewpoint on the change, moreover, the slipway to improve the situation were suggested by them. There were many disputes on the issue, some people think that will appear conflict that society is not ready, but, fortunately, these were not justified. It is already time to improve the status of Kazakh people are for the change. The only one problem that should be eliminated to develop the base of preparing and teaching people.BibliographyAkishev, K. and Baipakov, K., 1996, Kazakhstan tarihi (kone zamannan buginge deiin). Almaty Atamura cited 01 June 2006. Kozybayev, K., 1995, Kazakhstan tarihi. Almaty Zhalyn. cited 01 June 2006. Piskareva, L., 2006, Ne zaboltat iazik, Vremia, 21(365), p. 3. cited 02 June 2006. Embassy of RK. 2005. The Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan. online. purchasable from http//www.kazakhstanembassy.org.uk/cgi-bin/index/225 cited 30 whitethorn 2006. Demography. 2004. O chislennosti naselenia online.Available from http//stat.kz/stat/inde x.aspx?p=dem04-04&1=ru. cited 02 June 2006. Nazarbayeva, D. 2005. V Kazakhstane ne planiruetsya perevodit deloproizvodstvo tolko na gosudarstvennii yazik. Available from http//base.zakon.kz/doc/ attorney/?uid= undefinable&doc_id=30033184B cited 01 June 2006. Spravochnik iurist. 2005. Vopros akimu goroda Almaty.Available from http//base.zakon.kz/doc/lawyer/?uid=undefined&docid=30036955 cited 02 June 2006.Olcott, M. B., 1997. The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Online. Central Asian States An Overview of Fives Years of Independence.Available from www.ceip.org/people/mosenate.htm cited 02 June 2006.Omarov. B, 2005. Comitet po iazikam Ministerstva culture, informacii I sporta RK. Online. Skajite pojaluista.Available from http//base.zakon.kz/doc/lawyer/?uid=undefined &doc_id=30029966 cited 01 June 2006.Shahanov, M., and Tereschenko, S., 2005. Problema yazika Online. Shahanova I Tereschenko reshili soobscha borotsya s kolonizatsiei.Available from http//base.zakon.kz/doc/lawyer /?uid=undefined&doc_id=30048383 cited 02 June 2006.Suleimenov, O., 2005. Problema yazika. Online. Vibori test democratii.Available from http//base.zakon.kz/doc/lawyer/?uid=undefined&doc_id=30024571 cited 03 June 2006.