Essay --

In the Crito, Socrates debates with his friend and abetter _or_ abettor Crito on escaping from prison where Socrates awaits accomplishment. Crito unsuccessfully attempts to persuade Socrates to escape from prison precisely the latter is adamant and opts to remain in prison and meet his fate. This constitution argues that Socrates had strong convictions in his melodys. Therefore, the paper defends Socrates decision citing it as accurate and laudable even though it marked the end of his life. Firstly, the paper examines Critos propositions exhibiting the uplifted strong points as well as the destabilizing shortcomings. The second part examines Socrates apology outlining why it was the rightful choice. The main attention will be on Socrates core lineage founded on justice and doing injustice maligns ones thought. Therefore, the paper concludes by phrasing that it is not worth to live with a tainted, distraught and ruined soul. Propositions by CritoAccording to Crito, there are one-third major reasons as to why Socrates should escape from the prison. Notably, Crito offers lame self come to excuses for Socrates escape. Indeed, two of the reasons do not stand ground whereas the third concentrates on the victims responsibility to his offspring. Crito begins by proposing Socrates escape because failing to do so will doubly hurt him. Firstly, Crito enjoys a warm and fond friendship with Socrates. Therefore, his execution would distraught and melancholy him. On the other hand, Crito says that the execution of Socrates will harm his reputation. People will tantalize, taunt and jeer him for valuing his monies much than the life of his friend. This is because Crito can bribe Socrates way out of prison. According to Crito, the commonwealth will be prejudicial to him un... ...educed that it is not significant to live and instead to live a just and moral life. The second argument that supports Socrates decision to stay in prison is that of the repercussions t o the urban center of Athens. If Socrates escaped, the Athens urban center together with its fabric, laws, would be annihilated. By the extension, destruction of the Athens city equally destroyed the lives of people of Athens. Socrates argues that harming others is similar to harming ones soul because such an act constitute an unjust act. Therefore, it was a wiser decision to meet death rather than escape. Finally, Socrates considers the consensus argument in his decision to stay in prison. Escaping from prison broke his consensus with his city and such an act constituted injustice. Therefore, it constituted maligning ones soul and, therefore, it was better to die than live with an unjust soul.